top of page

Reflective Commentary

Groundwater-Smith et al state that “successful teaching depends on effective planning” (2011, p.186). It is essential to plan, structure and sequence learning programs that incorporate a range of teaching strategies and resources. This is essential when catering for a diverse range of learning styles and abilities (Duchesne et al, 2013). Consequently, during my practicum I incorporated a range of teaching strategies and resources including whole body movement, songs, a variety of activities with concrete items, card and board games, ICT, pair, group and independent work, KWL charts, giving continual feedback, goal setting, questioning, teaching reading strategies using visual posters, encouraging children to verbalise their thinking during problem solving and integrating subjects where possible. Clear learning outcomes for students has been shown to have significant impact on their learning (Groundwater-Smith et al, 2011) which is supported by SCSA (2017) which states that “students should be clear about what is expected of them, what they are trying to learn and why”. As a result, I ensured I utilised WALT and WILF in my lessons across the curriculum areas to make the learning objective explicit to children.

 

As stated in my teaching philosophy, I believe in a constructivist approach to teaching and learning. Consequently, throughout my practicum I endeavoured to provide hands-on, engaging lessons that provided opportunity for discussion and collaboration. SCSA states that “Students should have the opportunity to engage fully with the concepts they are expected to develop”. Additionally, research shows it is pivotal that children are highly engaged and enjoying the learning process (Groundwater-Smith et al, 2011). As a result, I always made a conscious effort to provide activities that I knew children would like and linked to their interests where possible. This is evident in my evidence of standard 1 where I incorporated children’s interests in dinosaurs, playdough beading and construction into my teaching of 3D shapes and measurement.

 

Significantly, continual evaluation is essential to ensure effective teaching and learning (Groundwater-Smith et al, 2011). Consequently, I did this continually throughout my practicum through reflecting on lessons and the learning that was achieved. I also used my assessments to ensure children were meeting the outcomes. If I felt progress was not adequate, I would alter my activities, re-teach to the whole class in a different way or have an explicit small group mini-lesson with students who were having difficulties.

 

See standard 5 for more evidence of setting achievable goals.

Situation

During my practicum, my mentor attended a PD where they spoke about a free-flowing phonics session and I offered to implement one in the classroom. The children all know their individual sounds. The class is teaching phase 3 of the letters and sounds program which including digraphs such as oi, ow, and air. Some children are becoming proficient with these however the majority of the class still require practice and support. Although the children are able to identify the sound on flash cards, they still have difficulty remembering to use their learned sounds when they read a word. As a result, I wanted to ensure my phonics activities provided opportunities for children to practice implementing their learned sounds through reading words as well as practising early reading skills.

Action

Fellowes and Oakley (2014) note that phonics teaching should be taught daily through an explicit and systematic approach as well as include a variety of multisensory teaching and learning strategies. I independently planned and prepared resources for a 40-minute phonics session to run 4 days per week. The session was structures with 10 minutes for a whole class lesson before I transitioned children to the free flow of multisensory activities. The 10-minute whole class lesson involved a mat session where I introduced or revised the concept we were going to be focusing on. For example, during guided reading I had noticed many children in the class were getting stuck on words with a long vowel sound. Although this is a year one learning outcome, I decided to introduce it to the children as it was pertinent and the school has instructed teachers to introduce and/or teach outcomes from the next year level whenever possible. I created a long and short vowel sounds chart where children came up with their “magic e” wand and turned CVC words into CVCe words. We discussed how the vowel sound had changed from short to long and also changed the meaning. I also had a game on the Smart Board where children helped to make the correct words starting with a CVC and then turning it into a CVCe. We discussed how the word had changed and what the new meaning was. I also integrated this into our daily morning message by drawing children’s attention to CVCE words such as home and also words with a long vowel sound or where y takes the form of a vowel such as ‘my’. Additionally, I incorporated it into the daily warm up for phonics where I did the sound flash cards and then had the vowels separate at the end. I asked the children to give me words with the particular vowel and then we decided whether it was a long or short sound.

During this time, I would work with a reading group each day for another 10 minutes on an activity that focused on the learning outcome of the whole class lesson. This enabled me to differentiate my teaching as the children were already in leveled reading groups. Assessment was also done during this period so it was achievable and in depth. In addition to various activities that focused on important skills such as sight words, blending, segmenting, handwriting and learned digraphs, I had a table set up to specifically focus on long and short vowel sounds. I had laminated words in black with the vowels in red. I had sorting tins and children worked in groups to read the word and then sort it according to a long or short vowel sound. I sat with this group for ten minutes before they were able to move onto different activities. I rotated the groups daily so each day I spent ten minutes with a different reading group which also enabled me to differentiate by changing the difficulty level of the words. Using a homogeneous small group approach to teaching word study has been shown to have a positive effect on literacy instruction (Williams, Phillips-Birdsong, Hufnagel, Hungler & Lundstrom, 2009).

Then I would spend 20 minutes moving around the classroom to provide support to individuals and groups. I switched out one or two activities with a new one each day which enabled children to develop the familiarity and independence with the activities while also keeping it interesting. This was also linked with my behaviour management chart as I had children who were ‘role models’ from that morning or the previous day to choose the activities they wanted to go to first.

Ultimately, I had a broad range of creative and engaging resources to teach phonics that were differentiated for the range of ability in the class. These included a variety of ICT resources such as iPads to practice letter formation, ‘magic E’ online games and Bob and Obb from phonics play (ref). We used the smart board to sort real and nonsense words by feeding them to Obb or Bob. I had then created my own Obb and Bob with nonsense and real words that contained the sounds we have been learning for children to practice on their own. Other resources included sand trays where children wrote words with sounds we have been learning and practiced letter formation, CVC sliders, a range of clip cards for blends, digraphs, vowels and initial sounds, sight word fluency cards, rhyming clip cards, syllable cards and sorts, blending puzzles as well as creating and writing words by picking out words with the sounds we have been learning this term with ‘say it, make it, write it’ mats. I had created the word cards by using colour coordinating all the sounds we had learned, to help children see the letter combination in words and assist them with sounding it out. I also had children do a word sort each day, which are mentioned by Fellowes and Oakley (2014) as effective strategies for teaching phonics. Additionally, I had clip cards set up at a table with children’s handwriting books and they were required to record 10 words in their books with a focus on letter formation and need handwriting. When they were finished they put a sticker on the chart to track their engagement, provide children with a sense of achievement and ensure everyone had finished their handwriting by the end of the week. I would have the education assistant, my mentor teacher or myself sit with these children to assist with handwriting.

Finally, I transitioned children to guided reading by introducing a new reading strategy with an accompanied card, such as “Flippy the Dolphin”. This was to remind them that when a word didn’t make sense they could change the vowel sound to make it long or short. Mini-lessons are beneficial for introducing or reminding students of a particular strategy (Seely-Flint et al, 2013). These cards were provided to each reading group and worked very well as they provided an opportunity for children to apply their new learning to their daily reading.

References

Fellowes, J. & Oakley, G. (2014). Language, Literacy and Early Childhood Education. (2nd ed). South Melbourne: Oxford Uni Press.

Seely Flint, A., Kitson, L., Lowe, K., & Shaw, K (2014). Literacy in Australia: Pedagogies for engagement. Milton, QLD: John Wiley & Son.

Williams, C., Phillips-Birdsong, C., Hufnagel, K., Hungler, D., & Lundstrom, R.P. (2009l). Word Study Instruction in the K-2 Classroom. The Reading Teacher, 62(7), 570-578.

School Curriculum and Standards Authority [SCSA]. (2016). Principles of Teaching, Learning and Assessment. Retrieved from https://k10outline.scsa.wa.edu.au/home/principles/guiding-principles/teaching-learning-and-assessment-principles

Action plan

  • When I am financially able I would like to attend Deb Calcott’s PD’s on “Moving on with Literacy” which links movement and literacy which I am very passionate about. Information on this can be found at http://www.movingonwithliteracy.com/

  • I will read Fellowes, J. & Oakley, G. (2014) more thoroughly and incorporate their strategies into my phonics session. For example, in my future teaching I will implement strategies such as more word sorts for both learned sound and sight words as Fellows and Oakley note they can significant help children in learning sight words, spelling, phonics and vocabulary. As well as other strategies such as word dominoes, word walls, onset-rime word spinners, matching games, and creating sentences with sight words and words with learned sounds as well as more modelled reading for the class to show decoding strategies through thinking aloud.

  • Phonics instruction is a hotly contested topic and there has been no consensus on the best way to teach phonics. Fellowes and Oakley note that instruction depends on educator judgement and the teaching context. As a result, I plan to undertake as much professional development on teaching phonics as possible and volunteer in a myriad of schools to observe their strategies. Ultimately, I will collate strategies and programs until I find something that aligns with my teaching philosophy.

  • I would like to attend professional development in relation to soundwaves and letters and sounds as these are commonly used in schools and I am unfamiliar with them and soundwaves has elements similar to THRASS. For example, I have sourced these Professional Development opportunities: https://dsf.net.au/Professional-Learning/letters-and-sounds-2-day-workshop-217ag/ and have signed up for a free online professional learning seminar for Sound Waves on the 31 October 2017.

Reading strategy cards

Reading strategy cards

Outcome

As I had planned my phonics session using the curriculum outcomes; it enabled me provide activities and explicit teaching that targeted essential learning objectives for students. The way I structured my phonics period resulted the ability for me to differentiate and work with groups at their ability level as well as provide opportunities for children to practice these skills, such as segmenting and blending, rhyme, syllables, handwriting and vowel sounds. It enabled children’s autonomy and independence, linking with the Early Years Framework (COAG, 2009), as they were able to select their own activities and engage with them at their own pace. I was also able to greatly decrease the amount of worksheets children had been doing and provide a plethora of engaging, hands-on experiences where children were highly engaged and practicing skills while enjoying themselves. I would do a vote at the end of the session to find out children’s favourite activities to ensure I had a nice even spread. Ultimately, even if children had difficulty sorting real and nonsense words or the vowel sound, what was most important was their development of decoding skills and familiarity with a myriad of letter combinations to create particular sounds.

Unfortunately, I only implemented these sessions for the last 2 weeks of school and did not get to see the full extent of the benefits for children. In the future I would start these phonics experiences from the very beginning, which would enable me to work on the specific sounds they have been learning that week as well as provide revision throughout the whole term/year. This would enable me to track progress more effectively over the year and tweak my activities and explicit teaching according to children’s progress. I would like to provide more explicit teaching and activities literacy skills such as making and breaking words with magnetic letters to discover spelling patterns which Fellowes and Oakley (2014) describes as particularly beneficial by helping children analyse and recognise similarities and differences between and among words, compare and contrast word features, and form generalizations that they can apply to new words.

bottom of page